{"id":46,"date":"2013-03-18T10:37:24","date_gmt":"2013-03-18T14:37:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ramapo.edu\/grants\/?page_id=46"},"modified":"2025-12-10T07:41:27","modified_gmt":"2025-12-10T12:41:27","slug":"grants-proposal-writing-review","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ramapo.edu\/grants\/grants-proposal-writing-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Sponsor Review Process"},"content":{"rendered":"

Whether submitting scholarly articles to academic journals or proposals to funding agencies, peer review ensures that a fair, transparent process is employed in judging the merits of proposed projects. Understanding the process and how to interpret reviewer comments is important as you continue to refine proposals for submission and re-submission. Different funding agencies employ different review processes; for this reason it is important to review the review criteria for the funding announcement to which you are applying. Below is information for four funding agencies.<\/p>\n

National Science Foundation (NSF)<\/h4>\n

Through its merit review process, the National Science Foundation (NSF) ensures that proposals submitted are reviewed in a fair, competitive, transparent, and in-depth manner.<\/p>\n