ࡱ> '` bjbjDD 42&&HHHHHHH~4V V V V D ,.  $ZhH H HH    jH H    HH NV # ^ 0,   H   , V V \p~HHHHHH Mar. 23rd, 2011 Faculty Assembly Executive Council (FAEC) Meeting Present: Jim Morley, Max Goldberg, Jeremy Teigen, Sam Mustafa, Alex Olbrecht, Jillian Weiss, Elaine Risch, Ruma Sen Secretary: Kristin Kenneavy 1. Approve Minutes Email approval pending on FAEC minutes from 3/9/11. FA minutes from 3/9/11 not posted yet. Pres. Morley will print them out and seek approval during the FA meeting. 2. Preparation for the Faculty Assembly Meeting a. By-laws Proposals Pres. Morley prepared a clarification of Article 8 to be read in the FA. Rep. Risch suggested that point 4 in the clarification be rephrased to be more succinct and clear. Suggestions for revision included stressing the importance of following the current by-laws and deferring to the ruling of the parliamentarian in the event that the by-laws are unclear. The interpretation of Article 8 should not yet be considered a dispute as the disagreement over interpretation has not been presented to the FA yet. The ambiguity stemming from Article 8 has been applied to the last vote on the governance structure, although the faculty members may not be aware of the special provision in the by-laws for the vote to adopt the interim by-laws as permanent. It was recommended that this be clearly explained to the faculty assembly. Another point of discussion was that the proposed amendment (Amendment 9) to Article 8 is still unclear and that the language should be made extremely precise prior to the vote on the amendments. In general, the FAEC believes that the by-laws should state that two-thirds of ALL faculty must vote yes in order to change the by-laws. However, the Faculty Governance Committee seems to be arguing that two-thirds of all votes cast are sufficient to adopt the proposed amendments to the by-laws. There was some discussion regarding the current location of the by-laws document and the need to make clear which set of by-laws are being utilized at this time. b. ARC CEC Proposal The Design Team had put out a statement of a general course objective to be utilized with CEC. ARC is presenting their short document that outlines a slight revision of this objective. c. May Faculty Conference The H-wing auditorium has been booked for the faculty conference. The second day of the conference coincides with the college picnic is during the conference. Assessment asked for half the time. Rep. Weiss had volunteered to organize three thematic segments for the conference, which should be crisp and enlightening. The three themes are going to be given interesting titles, which are still under consideration. The themes include (paraphrased): (1) What Middle Stated Want? Faculty Involvement in Assessment and the Consequences of Inaction (2) Isnt it Rich? The Course Enrichment Component and Students (3) Academically Adrift: Public Education in the Current Political and Economic Climate. Discussion of how best to organize the conference ensued, but it was eventually decided that Rep. Weiss would ultimately be in charge of assigning time to topical content. A suggestion for possible content included student drinking behaviors and their consequences (Student Affairs). The conference will last one day, from approximately 8:30 am (breakfast) to 4 pm. 3. Update on Separately Budgeted Research Task Force Rachel Budin resigned from the task force, so another person familiar with AFT policies will be needed to fill that slot. Provost Barnett is quite interested in this topic and intends remain involved with the task force; the Provosts office provides SBR money. The Provost will not sending a representative to the meetings regularly but would like to be invited to meetings from time to time. 4. Winter Session/Accelerated Final Grade Submission Proposal Pres. Morley met with Provost Barnett regarding this issue. The faculty will need a concrete proposal to vote on. A task force on the winter session could be put together, potentially, to address scheduling and issues of rigor in winter session courses. AIS faculty members, when canvassed, either didnt care about making changes or were opposed to changes. Faculty members in CA are generally in favor of the proposed changes. The longer break affects International Education, makes study abroad during break more feasible. The literature professors are not in favor of shortening the winter break due to grading longer written assignments. Pres. Morley will ask Registrar Cynthia Brennan whether Banner is able to do rolling due dates based on when the final exams are scheduled. It was again notes that this has the potential to encourage faculty to move their final exams into the last week of class. 5. Review of Annual Agenda Spreadsheet of actionable items will be sent to SSHS by Rep. Weiss (who created the spreadsheet). Will be discussed next week during FAEC meeting. 6. Academic Commons Dining area will not be a go in the Atrium. Student union owns that space and student activity fees pay for it, so it cant be made a permanent faculty space. A new location will need to be found. Motion to adjourn. Approved.  j ' 3 = ɰ|eNA:6:hb- hb-h`hb-h`B*^Jph-hb-hF{0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-h~0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph3hb-h~0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph3hb-hb-0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0hb-h~0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph hb-h~(hEOh~0JCJOJPJQJ^JaJhkh` hEOh~h~h~H*h~BC A B  zZQngdKgdb- &dPgd~gd~gd~= U h u ɯ~gPg~P-hb-h`0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-hb-0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-h~0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph3hb-hb-0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph3hb-h~0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0hb-h~0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJphh~CJOJQJaJ hb-h~ hb-h`hb-  " - @ A B  :     묕~gU#h~B*CJOJQJ^JaJph-hb-h 0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-h0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-hb-0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h #0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hb-h #0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'hb-0JB*CJOJPJQJaJphz{}56YPѺтkWWW'hK0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h_h_0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h_0JB*CJOJPJQJaJphh_h~B*^Jph-h_h 0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h_h`0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h_h~0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h_hY0JB*CJOJPJQJaJphPQ &. E©xaxaxaxaxaxax©G3hKh~0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph-hKhK0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hKh"0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph3hKhK0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0hKhK0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph#h~B*CJOJQJ^JaJph'hK0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h_hK0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph  9Y +-GJajSм}i'hC0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'ho A0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hKho A0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h0?V0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-hChQ0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph0hKh~0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph#JSTo STWano{ϵkWkWkWkJ3-h0?VhUZ0JB*CJOJPJQJaJphh0?Vh~B*^Jph'h0?V0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h0?Vho A0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph0h0?Vho A0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph3h0?Vh0?V0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph3h0?VhQ0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0h0?VhQ0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph-hKhC0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph*5CEʹrrrr[[T h0?Vh"-h0?Vh"0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h0?Vho A0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph-h0?Vh`0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph'h0?V0JB*CJOJPJQJaJph0h0?Vh`0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph3h0?Vh0?V0J5>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0h0?Vh0?V0J5B*CJOJPJQJaJph21h:pUZ/ =!"#$% 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666J@J ~Normal dCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k( 0No List Ng@N ~0HTML TypewriterCJOJPJQJ^JaJHOH ~ No SpacingCJ_HaJmH sH tH 2BCABz$$$$$$$8$$($($($h $$$$$$$$$h$h$8$ot$8$8BCABzZ Q n JSTo0000000000000000000000000000000000000= PS\(# AA@0(  B S  ?ms',  .5` 3333333 GJajSTT _ s0o AKQ0?VUZk~F{`b-] #YphC"=x@p@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial7&{ @Calibri?5 z Courier New"qhhZ&hZ& $ $242HP)$P~2MarDKNJKkenneavOh+'0H   ( 4@HPX`MarDKNJNormal Kkenneav2Microsoft Office Word@@M@MGVT$m _|&" WMFC ``l UT#m EMF`Q` l     %  Rp@"Calibri7&{ @Calibr 00Ln0(dv%  Tx,+bUUAXA,WL \Mar. 23' Rp@"Calibrij+TrU|pT0080@pTr`T;0&rT07&{ @CalibrT0rg dT0dTLn0|Tdv% TX&IUUAXABL Prd % Tp+HbUUAXAWL X, 2011 TTI+dbUUAXAIWL P  Tt,cUUAXA,1L Faculty Assembly Executive Council (FAEC) Meeting#  %      ' TTcUUAXAL P  TT,FUUAXA,L P  T8, UUAXA,'L Present: Jim Morley, Max Goldberg, Jere  % '  '   T UUAXAL |my Teigen, Sam Mustafa, $   % ' T UUAXA L hAlex Olbrecht   T UUAXAL p, Jillian Weiss, '   )  Tx UUAXAL \Elaine     Tl,KUUAXA,@L XRisch T[KUUAXA@ L `, Ruma Sen % TT\vKUUAXA\@L P  T,~(UUAXA,L Secretary: Kristin Kenneavy    TT)~BUUAXA)L P ! '% L&=& J??d00( 0L>U> J??d00( 0LVmV J??d00( 0Lnn J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L- J??d00( 0L.E. J??d00( 0LF]F J??d00( 0L^u^ J??d00( 0Lvv J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L5 J??d00( 0L6M6 J??d00( 0&" WMFC `f`LNeN J??d00( 0Lf}f J??d00( 0L~~ J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L  J??d00( 0L% J??d00( 0L&=& J??d00( 0L>U> J??d00( 0LVmV J??d00( 0Lnn J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L- J??d00( 0L.E. J??d00( 0LF]F J??d00( 0L^u^ J??d00( 0Lvv J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L5 J??d00( 0L6M6 J??d00( 0LNeN J??d00( 0Lf}f J??d00( 0L~~ J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L  J??d00( 0L% J??d00( 0L&=& J??d00( 0&" WMFC `F`L>U> J??d00( 0LVmV J??d00( 0Lnn J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L- J??d00( 0L.E. J??d00( 0LF]F J??d00( 0L^u^ J??d00( 0Lvv J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0L J??d00( 0% ( "  TT,F0UUAXA,%L P  Rp@"Calibri7&{ @CalibrTT< TT0TLn0Tdv% T`,cXUUAXA,L T1.  % TYc.UUAXAY L `Approve M (Tp/cUUAXA/L Xinutes '% LdYYL!??% ( % TTcUUAXAL P TTcUUAXAL P  T,UUAXA,L |Email approval pending o%    T!UUAXAL n FAEC minutes from 3/9/11.  %  %  TT"<UUAXA"L P  T,6mUUAXA,b L dFA minutes  %  T6mUUAXAb L dfrom 3/9/11 %  T6mUUAXAb L `not posted T6]mUUAXAbL | yet. Pres. Morley will   '  ! T^6mUUAXA^bL tprint them out and   %   T6mUUAXAb L hseek approval  T6mUUAXAb L d during the   TT6mUUAXAbL P  TX,n[UUAXA,L PFAT\nUUAXA\ L d meeting. %  TT nDUUAXA L P %Rp@1Courier New?5z Courie New\\< \\0\Ln0\dv%  TT,PUUAXA,L P % % T`,X UUAXA,L T2.  % TdY UUAXAYL TPrepTx< UUAXAL \aration T= UUAXA= L ` for the F   Txd UUAXAL \aculty   TTe UUAXAeL PATL UUAXA L `ssembly M%  (TpM UUAXAML Xeeting '% LdY&" WMFC `&`Yl!??% ( % TT UUAXAL P TT UUAXAL P  TT, PDUUAXA,9L P % Tl,E|UUAXA,qL Xa. By TTE|UUAXAqL P-TE|UUAXAqL hlaws Proposals !  TTE|UUAXAqL P TTE|UUAXAqL P  TT,}FUUAXA,L P  Tp,UUAXA,L XPres.  TTUUAXAL PM'TlUUAXAL Xorley T<UUAXAL l prepared a clar    T=UUAXA= L dification o   TUUAXAL lf Article 8 to       T7UUAXAL tbe read in the FA.      T8UUAXA8 L dRep. Risch    TUUAXAL |suggested that point 4       T,$UUAXA,?L in the clarification be rephrased to be more succinct and clear            %     TX$UUAXAL P. T :$UUAXA#L Suggestions for revision included          T,%\UUAXA,Q4L stressing the importance of following the current by   %   !    TT%\UUAXAQL P-T %{\UUAXAQ#L laws and deferring to the ruling of !        Tl|%\UUAXA|QL X the   T<,]UUAXA,(L parliamentarian in the event that the by $       TT]#UUAXAL P-T$]iUUAXA$L plaws are unclear. !    TTj]UUAXAjL P  TT,FUUAXA,L P  T,"UUAXA,`L The interpretation of Article 8 should not yet be considered a dispute as the disagreement over                      %   Th,EUUAXA,:ZL interpretation has not been presented to the FA yet. The ambiguity stemming from Article 8            %   $%  %    TTEUUAXA:L P T`(EUUAXA:L ThasTp)EUUAXA):L X been   T,NUUAXA,z L dapplied to    TDNUUAXAz)L the last vote on the governance structure      TNUUAXAz3L , although the faculty members may not be aware of      %% %   !   T,VUUAXA,L the special provision in the by        TTWdUUAXAWL P-TDeYUUAXAe)L laws for the vote to adopt the interim by !        % TTZgUUAXAZL P-ThUUUAXAhL laws as permanent.&" WMFC `` It was !  %  !  Th,UUAXA,/L recommended that this be clearly explained to t%%            T$UUAXAL the faculty assembly.   %  TT%.UUAXA%L P TT/8UUAXA/L P TT9SUUAXA9L P  T,9KpUUAXA,e`L Another point of discussion was that the proposed amendment (Amendment 9) to Article 8 is still        !    %% %%          T,yUUAXA,dL unclear and that the language should be made extremely precise prior to the vote on the amendments.          % %           %%  T,,UUAXA,%L In general, the FAEC believes that th        TdUUAXAL Te by TT(UUAXAL P-T)UUAXA)L laws should state that two !     !TT"UUAXAL P-T0#UUAXA#&L thirds of ALL faculty must vote  yes       %    T,1 UUAXA,& L in order to change the by      TT1 UUAXA& L P-T1 UUAXA& IL laws. However, the Faculty Governance Committee seems to be arguing that ! !     %%  %       T`,: sq UUAXA,f L Ttwo!TTt: q UUAXAtf L P-T8: uq UUAXAf RL thirds of all votes cast are sufficient to adopt the proposed amendments to the by              %%   TTv: q UUAXAvf L P-Tp: q UUAXAf L Xlaws. ! TT: q UUAXAf L P  T,  UUAXA, BL There was some discussion regarding the current location of the by ! %            TT   UUAXA  L P-T u UUAXA L laws document and the need to ! %      T,  UUAXA, L make clear which set of by%   !    TT ' UUAXA L P-T0(  UUAXA( &L laws are being utilized at this time. !          % TT  UUAXA L P  % TT,Q P} UUAXA,r L P % % T,  UUAXA, L tb. ARC CEC Proposal    TT  UUAXA L P TT  UUAXA L P  Td, z& UUAXA, L TThe  T{ t& UUAXA{ L dDesign Team   % Tdu & UUAXAu L Thad  T B& UUAXA L tput out a statement    % TC & UUAXAC L |of a general course obje     T0 & UUAXA &L ctive to bF&WMFC``e utilized with CEC. ARC is       !      T@,/ f UUAXA,[ SL presenting their short document that outlines a slight revision of this objective.      %                TT/ f UUAXA[ L P % 6 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 6  ~."System-@"Calibri- 2 ]Q}Mar. 23 @"Calibri-2 Wx}rd-2 ]}, 2011 2 ]} U2 lQ1}Faculty Assembly Executive Council (FAEC) Meeting   2 lT}  2 {Q} F2 Q'}Present: Jim Morley, Max Goldberg, Jere   /2 }my Teigen, Sam Mustafa,   2  }Alex Olbrecht%2 }, Jillian Weiss, s 2 ,}Elaine 2 Q}Rische2 k }, Ruma Sen  2 } 42 Q}Secretary: Kristin Kenneavyt 2 } ,}-=A J P( 0=A J V( 0=A J ]( 0=A J c( 0=A J j( 0=A J p( 0=A J w( 0=A J }( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J  ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J &( 0=A J ,( 0=A J 3( 0=A J 9( 0=A J @( 0=A J F( 0=A J M( 0=A J S( 0=A J Z( 0=A J `( 0=A J g( 0=A J m( 0=A J t( 0=A J z( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J  ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J ( 0=A J #( 0=A J *( 0=A J 0( 0=A J 7( 0=A J =( 0=A J D( 0=A J J( 0=A J Q( 0=A J W( 0=A J ^( 0-' 2 Q} @"Calibri-2 Q}1. -2 ] }Approve M 2 }inutes- @ !Z]-- 2 }  2 } /2 Q}Email approval pending o 42 }n FAEC minutes from 3/9/11.   2 d} 2 0Q }FA minutes  2 0 }from 3/9/11  2 0 }not posted/2 0} yet. Pres. Morley will   (2 0t}print them out and w 2 0 }seek approval2 0 } during thea 2 0S} 2 ?Q}FA2 ?^ } meeting.   2 ?}  @1Courier New- 2 LQ}  -2 [Q}2. -2 []}Prep2 [u}aration2 [ } for the F2 [}aculty  2 [}A2 [ }ssembly M  2 [*}eeting- @ !\]-- 2 [J}  2 [M}  2 jQ}  2 yQ}a. Byg 2 yj}- 2 ym}laws Proposals  2 y}  2 y}  2 Q} 2 Q}Pres.  2 m}M 2 x}orley #2 } prepared a clar2  }ification o "2 }f Article 8 to r(2 S}be read in the FA. 2  }Rep. Risch .2 }suggested that point 4 j2 Q?}in the clarification be rephrased to be more succinct and clear 2 }. @2 #} Suggestions for revision included Y2 Q4}stressing the importance of following the current by   2 W}-@2 [#}laws and deferring to the ruling of 2 } the G2 Q(}parliamentarian in the event that the by  2 }-&2 }laws are unclear.   2 w}  2 Q} 2 Q`}The interpretation of Article 8 should not yet be considered a dispute as the disagreement over  2 QZ}interpretation has not been presented to the FA yet. The ambiguity stemming from Article 8    2 !} 2 $}has2 5} been 2 Q }applied to I2 )}the last vote on the governance structureX2 X3}, although the faculty members may not be aware of     :2 Q}the special provision in the by 2 }-I2 )}laws for the vote to adopt the interim by   2 }-22 }laws as permanent. It was    R2 )Q/}recommended that this be clearly explained to t )2 )C}he faculty assembly.  2 )}  2 )}  2 )} 2 FQ`}Another point of discussion was that the proposed amendment (Amendment 9) to Article 8 is still      2 WQd}unclear and that the language should be made extremely precise prior to the vote on the amendments.     C2 iQ%}In general, the FAEC believes that th 2 i}e by 2 i}-22 i }laws should state that two   2 i}-D2 i&}thirds of ALL faculty must vote yes  12 zQ}in order to change the byo 2 z}-y2 zI}laws. However, the Faculty Governance Committee seems to be arguing that     2 Q}two  2 e}-2 hR}thirds of all votes cast are sufficient to adopt the proposed amendments to the by   2 }-2  }laws.   2 %} n2 QB}There was some discussion regarding the current location of the by   2 }-82 }laws document and the need to   22 Q}make clear which set of by   2 }-D2 &}laws are being utilized at this time.    2 } - 2 Q}  -(2 Q}b. ARC CEC Proposal. 2 }  2 } 2 Q}The 2 g }Design Team  2 }had )2 }put out a statement  /2 '}of a general course objeD2 &}ctive to be utilized with CEC. ARC is  2 QS}presenting their short document that outlines a slight revision of this objective.   2 } -}}}}}}||||||||{{{{՜.+,0 hp|  $ ' Mar Title  !#$%&'()*+-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F:NData 1Table" WordDocument42SummaryInformation(,xDocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q